Docs fix spelling issues #136054
Docs fix spelling issues #136054
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @BoxyUwU (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Please squish your commits into one. |
| // struct's edges. | ||
| if let Ok(layout) = &layout { | ||
| // Don't try to calculate an end-biased layout for unsizable structs, | ||
| // Don't try to calculate an end-biased layout for unseizable structs, |
|
|
||
| /// The layout of a type, alongside the type itself. | ||
| /// Provides various type traversal APIs (e.g., recursing into fields). | ||
| /// Provides various types of traversal APIs (e.g., recursing into fields). |
|
Based on the fact that some of these typo fixes seem wrong, and the fact that we've seen a wave of tiny fix PRs similar to yours that we suspect are linked with blockchain rewards, I'm going to close this PR. These sometimes result in github deleting the entire account and all PRs of that account, causing trouble for tooling processing commits and corresponding PRs. To avoid encouraging such PRs and to prevent churn from deleted PRs we will not accept such PRs. If you would like to contribute to the project, you are more than welcome to contribute something more substantial. |
| Unadjusted, | ||
| /// For things unlikely to be called, where reducing register pressure in | ||
| /// `extern "Rust"` callers is worth paying extra cost in the callee. | ||
| /// `extern "Rust"` callers are worth paying an extra cost in the callee. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original is correct, "reducing register pressure (in ...) is"
7 participants
Hello
I fixed several spelling issues.
Glad I could help
Br, Elias.